pakt
Contract analysis platform for Azerbaijani businesses — clause-level risk scoring, amendment-vs-base conflict detection, OCR, and voice verdicts. FastAPI + LangChain LCEL.
Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
Gastarbeiter97
Source: github_repo_search
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.
These names and descriptions are the publisher's own, read from the source code. We print them as written. Our assessment is the findings above, not this list.
list_contractsList the account's contracts: company, status, dates, our role, and whether the document is in and analysed. Use get_contract for one contract's risks.
get_contractOne contract's overview: its details, the verdict (summary, top risks, asymmetries), how many clauses are red, yellow and green, every clause's risk level with who it favours and why, and its amendments with their conflict counts.
analyze_contractUpload a contract document and run PAKT's pipeline on it: text extraction (OCR for scans), clause splitting, the risk of every clause and the verdict. Give contract_id to replace an existing contract's document, or company, title, contract_number, start_date and our_role to create a new contract. Wa…
compare_amendmentThe conflicts between a contract's amendments and the contract itself: for each amendment item, the base clauses it contradicts, modifies, adds or changes in our favour (benefits), how serious each is (red, yellow, green) and why - with counts of conflicts against us and in our favour. Give file_pat…
Tool annotations
No tools have read-only/destructive annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
4/4 tools missing one or more hints — list_contracts (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_contract (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); analyze_contract (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +1 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
Readable source code
1 file are minified or bundled, which is usually build output rather than concealment
Ship unminified, readable source.
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/gastarbeiter97/pakt)?variant=verified from the URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check