mcp-codebase-intelligence (g-tiwari/mcp-codebase-intelligence) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 18 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100
1 month ago

mcp-codebase-intelligence

Provides a semantic understanding of your codebase by parsing with tree-sitter and building a graph of symbols and dependencies. Enables AI assistants to navigate code, analyze changes, and discover architecture using 18 tools with minimal context overhead.

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

g-tiwari

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configLOG_LEVELLogging verbosity: debug, info, warn, error info
configPROJECT_ROOTe =/path/to/your/project
configPROJECT_ROOTSUse for projects spanning multiple repositories:
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

18/18 tools missing one or more hints — list_projects (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); switch_project (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); add_project (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +15 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

15/18 tool handlers declare input schemas (83%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 0/18 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (0%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tool test coverage

Only 2/18 tools referenced in tests (11%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

1 child_process call — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/g-tiwari/mcp-codebase-intelligence)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/g-tiwari/mcp-codebase-intelligence)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 357f4e0404c5435f52a0f310c8e8f36af83f8305
code hash: a61a7da94c2b7fa3c5c3755615865da3dad711457d17c1e4f92ab3aa163689b7
verified: 8/7/2026, 4:31:29 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client