Footics MCP (Footics/mcp-server) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust Indexm8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
2 months ago

Footics MCP

Enables AI assistants to interact with the Footics World Cup 2026 prediction game, reading matches, standings, predictions, and optionally submitting predictions.

→ Footics/mcp-server· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Footics

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 2 credentials: SUPABASE_ANON_KEY, TEST_PASSWORD
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configMCP_ENABLEDtrue false → /mcp returns 503 with no Supabase/DB call (kill switch)
configMCP_ENABLE_WRITESlib/predictions.ts — writes with the same guardrails as the main app. Off by default (=false).
configMCP_OAUTH_ISSUER
configMCP_PUBLIC_URL
configMCP_RATE_LIMIT_PER_MIN30 tool calls per minute per user (0 = off)
configMCP_REQUIRE_AUTHtrue require a valid bearer token (401 otherwise)
configMCP_TEST_USER_ID
configMCP_TOKEN_VERIFYgetuser getuser (robust) or jwks (local, asymmetric)
🔐 secretSUPABASE_ANON_KEY
configSUPABASE_URL
configTEST_EMAIL
🔐 secretTEST_PASSWORD
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployDATABASE_URL
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_ANON_KEY
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_SUPABASE_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

10/10 tools missing one or more hints — whoami (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); list_matches (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_match (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +7 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool inputs are validated

6/10 tool handlers declare input schemas (60%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 0/10 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (0%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

Tests exist

No test files found

Add tests that exercise each declared tool.

Dependency freshness

1/11 production deps stale: server-only@2022-09-03 (3.8y)

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/footics-mcp-server-1j2op9)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/footics-mcp-server-1j2op9)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 225c75e3337bdeb5d8cc4cbacfd39407928f431a
code hash: c542b5cea41147f3515351e80c4cbb1276d1aacb4a0828921c0a64dbac79e9f4
verified: 6/23/2026, 10:30:15 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client