Korean Law MCP (episodic-rush/korean-law-mcp-clean) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 98 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
20 days ago

Korean Law MCP

An MCP server that provides Korean legal information through 10 tools, including statutes, precedents, administrative rules, and citation verification with hallucination prevention, enabling legal research and analysis via AI assistants or CLI.

→ episodic-rush/korean-law-mcp-clean· listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

episodic-rush

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: KOREAN_LAW_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configCORS_ORIGIN
configFALLBACK_RATE_LIMIT_RPM
🔐 secretKOREAN_LAW_API_KEY
configLAW_API_PROTOCOL폐쇄망/인증서 문제 환경을 위해 =http 옵션 추가(기본 https). 판례 재검색 키워드 후보 생성 개선으로 매칭률 향상. (외부 PR #41/#42)
configLAW_EXTERNAL_HTTPS_PROXYsetx http://proxy-host:8080 /M
configLAW_EXTERNAL_TLS_REJECT_UNAUTHORIZEDsetx 0 /M
configLAW_OC"": "honggildong"
configLAW_REFERER
configLAW_RESPONSE_TYPE
configLAW_USER_AGENTfetch-with-retry.ts에 일반 브라우저 UA 기본 헤더 주입 — 호출자 코드 변경 0, 한 줄 패치로 모든 도구 복구. 환경변수로 override 가능
configMCP_BODY_LIMIT
configMCP_MAX_BATCH_CALLSv4.7.0 보안·운영 패치 동봉: JSON-RPC 배치의 tools/call을 개수만큼 rate limit·폴백 쿼터에 계수(배치 증폭 차단, 요청당 상한 20 — ) + graceful shutdown idle 연결 정리(clean exit) + get_article_history lawName 정확매칭 우선(가나다순 오매칭 방지)
configRATE_LIMIT_RPM
configTRUST_PROXY보안 High 2건 — fetch-with-retry.ts 타임아웃/네트워크 에러에 API 키 포함 URL이 로그로 유출되던 문제 → maskSensitiveUrl()로 OC= 마스킹. trust proxy true → 환경변수(기본 1), X-Forwarded-For 스푸핑 rate limit 우회 차단
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

98/98 tools missing one or more hints — search_law (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_law_text (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_article_detail (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +95 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

31/98 tools referenced in tests (32%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/episodic-rush/korean-law-mcp-clean)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/episodic-rush/korean-law-mcp-clean)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 459118a8a3e812fb50499fe112386b023780d820
code hash: 49bc0b604bbe96615ec9a4c07748064214a27a3a0f0aaaa4c99e0e44bf7eb66b
verified: 8/21/2026, 1:50:19 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client