kip-mcp-server (dillan/kip-mcp-server) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
74/100
25 days ago

kip-mcp-server

An MCP server that lets an AI assistant look at your boat's Signal K data and help you design and install KIP dashboards.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

dillan

Source: Glama · also listed on npm

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
1 flow detected: SIGNALK_TOKEN. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: SIGNALK_TOKEN
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configSIGNALK_HOSTYour Signal K host name or IP localhost
configSIGNALK_PORTYour Signal K port 3000
configSIGNALK_TLSSet to true if your server uses https false
🔐 secretSIGNALK_TOKENA Signal K login token, needed to write dashboards (none)
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

22/22 tools missing one or more hints — compose_dashboard (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); recommend_dashboard_set (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); preview_dashboard (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +19 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

15/22 tools referenced in tests (68%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

3 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Secrets stay with their owner

1 secret/sensitive value flow into network calls (SIGNALK_TOKEN → dynamic)

Audit where credentials are sent. A NOTION_TOKEN should only reach api.notion.com — never a third-party host.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/dillan-kip-mcp-server-l7lcks?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/dillan-kip-mcp-server-l7lcks)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: bd9a4eb226569fcccec34eaf9c1a9bafdc0fe4a3
code hash: ed0c4b90213fcc4a8b0082fba4ce51077ef5949a7c093f8324988d2bbc547669
verified: 8/7/2026, 4:33:27 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client