Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
—
Grade unavailable

Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence

Structured Safety Intelligence for cosmetic formulation. Query 38,411 NOAEL records, 68,540 pre-calculated Margin of Safety values, and 25,157 jurisdictional regulatory opinions across 12 markets (EU, US FDA, Korea MFDS, Japan MHLW, ASEAN, Saudi SFDA, Canada, Australia, ECHA SVHC, CA Prop 65, CA TFCA, WA TFCA). Tools: check_ingredient, check_formula, search_ingredients, calculate_mos. v1.1.0: every ingredient response includes full jurisdictional_profile across all 12 jurisdictions.

· 306 installs· listed on smithery

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

Cosmetic Regulatory Intelligence

Source: Smithery

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find.

Install from

Smitherynot scored here

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// quality suggestions

All four hints declared on every tool

4/4 tools missing one or more hints — check_ingredient (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); check_formula (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); search_ingredients (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +1 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any hint is missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 1 concrete improvement we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/cosmetic-regulatory-intelligence)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/cosmetic-regulatory-intelligence)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
code hash: 8dbe30bdbbef6ce993af16ed074431200e98bde9954077f32e7e750bef191249
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client