This is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server adaptation of LangChain Ollama Deep Researcher. It provides the deep research capabilities as MCP tools that can be used within the model context protocol ecosystem, allowing AI assistants to perform in-depth research on topics (locally) via Ollama
Warning. Serious findings were identified. Review the full report before connecting. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.
How we verified
Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.
⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →Who stands behind it
Cam10001110101
Source: modelscope
Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →
Install from
M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.
DOCKER_CONTAINEREXA_API_KEYFor Exa: (Get yours at https://dashboard.exa.ai/api-keys)PERPLEXITY_API_KEYFor Perplexity:TAVILY_API_KEYFor Tavily:Tool annotations
No tools have read-only/destructive annotations
Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.
All four hints declared on every tool
3/3 tools missing one or more hints — research (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_status (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); configure (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.
For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.
Descriptions match behaviour
1 tool describes read intent but its handler mutates — research (line 120: spawn(command, [)
Rename the tool, rewrite the description, or move the side-effect into a separate clearly-named tool.
Tool inputs are validated
2/3 tool handlers declare input schemas (67%)
Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.
Tests exist
No test files found
Add tests that exercise each declared tool.
Shell command execution
1 child_process/subprocess call in production code — runs shell commands (src/index.ts:120)
Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.
Secrets never reach shell commands
1 secret value passed to shell commands — possible command injection
Never pass secrets through shell commands. Use library APIs that accept credentials as arguments.
Secrets not logged
1 secret value sent to console.log
Redact or omit secret values from log output.
Tool description accuracy
research: description implies read-only but handler writes/deletes/executes
Update tool descriptions to accurately reflect all capabilities — especially write, delete, or execute operations.
Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.
[](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/cam10001110101-mcp-server-ollama-deep-researcher-nq1py8)?variant=verified from the URL.Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.
https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check