Mercado Libre Monorepo (bue221/prueba-tecnica-mercado-libre) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: we have no way to read this server ourselves. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
74/100
2 months ago

Mercado Libre Monorepo

Esta es una prueba tecnica de mercado libre

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

bue221

Source: mcp.so

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
🚨
Secret credentials may flow to a network call
2 flows detected: NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL. We can’t prove the destination matches the brand the credential belongs to.
// known CVEs in dependencies1 medium1 low

Disclosed vulnerabilities in this server's declared npm dependencies (via OSV). Whether each is reachable depends on the installed versions.

mediumturbo@2.5.4GHSA-hcf7-66rw-9f5r

Trubo: Login callback CSRF/session fixation

lowturbo@2.5.4GHSA-3qcw-2rhx-2726

Turbo: Unexpected local code execution during Yarn Berry detection

Depend on this server? Get alerted when its CVEs change.Watch this server free →
// environment variables
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL
deployPORT
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

2/2 tools missing one or more hints — get-product-info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); create-product (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 0/2 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (0%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Tool test coverage

Only 0/2 tools referenced in tests (0%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Secrets stay with their owner

2 secret/sensitive values flow into network calls (NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL → dynamic, NEXT_PUBLIC_API_URL → dynamic)

Audit where credentials are sent. A NOTION_TOKEN should only reach api.notion.com — never a third-party host.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 6 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/bue221-prueba-tecnica-mercado-libre-1kgyz2?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/bue221-prueba-tecnica-mercado-libre-1kgyz2)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 5d609ae587db6e36cfd12a4c2b013854638c546d
code hash: 9f22330cae612a000ebb1e9d567cc68fb44743790df5fcbbd731822496fca4e1
verified: 6/17/2026, 11:52:00 AM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client