GPT Image 2 (borys520/gpt-image-2-mcp) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 6 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Emerging
74/100
27 days ago

GPT Image 2

Exposes OpenAI's gpt-image-2 model for image generation and iterative editing through MCP tools.

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

borys520

Source: PulseMCP · also listed on Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
6 tools verified — handlers match their declared behaviour
1 read-only tool verified — handlers contain no write/delete/exec
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 1 credential: OPENAI_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configGPT_IMAGE_2_MCP_DEBUGSet to 1 to emit verbose debug logs on stderr.
configGPT_IMAGE_2_OUTPUT_DIRGlobal default for where images are saved. Absolute paths used as-is, relative resolved from CWD.
🔐 secretOPENAI_API_KEY"": "sk-..."
configOPENAI_BASE_URLOverride for proxies / enterprise routes
configOPENAI_ORG_IDForwarded as organization
configOPENAI_PROJECT_IDForwarded as project
configOPENAI_RESPONSES_EDIT_MODELHost model used by the Responses-API fallback edit route (default gpt-4.1-mini). See Edit routing below.
configOPENAI_USE_DIRECT_EDITSThe legacy toggle from 0.2.0 is deprecated and ignored (its only meaningful setting was 1 — opt into the direct endpoint, which is now the default).
configXDG_CONFIG_HOME
// quality suggestions

Tool inputs are validated

Only 0/6 tool handlers declare input schemas (0%)

Declare an inputSchema with zod/joi/yup on every tool definition.

Tool test coverage

3/6 tools referenced in tests (50%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Shell command execution

1 child_process/subprocess call in production code — runs shell commands (src/utils/output-dir.ts:78)

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 3 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/borys520/gpt-image-2-mcp)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/borys520/gpt-image-2-mcp)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: f922479662fdcd9137d7fd68b5e9c7d6ea9853fd
code hash: aade110cff27bf7500c933bb006a31d90b4f42a4464c1e799717423777a4a54d
verified: 8/16/2026, 5:37:18 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client