agentmetry (blitzcrieg1/agentmetry) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 3 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100

agentmetry

Local-first flight recorder for AI coding agents. Hash-chained audit trail, MITRE-mapped sequence detection, DLP. Forwards to the SIEM you already run.

→ blitzcrieg1/agentmetry· listed on github_repo_search

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

blitzcrieg1

Source: github_repo_search

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

GitHub

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
🔐
You'll be asked for 3 credentials: AGENTMETRY_API_KEY, AGENTMETRY_AGT_HMAC_KEY, BLACKBOX_API_KEY
These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configAGENTMETRY_CORRELATION_ID
configAGENTMETRY_SOURCE_APP
configAGENTMETRY_DEMO_COLOR
configAGENTMETRY_DEMO_FAST
configAGENTMETRY_AUDIT_EXPORT_PATH
configAGENTMETRY_AUDIT_DB_PATH
configAGENTMETRY_DETECTION_LIVE_DB_PATH
configAGENTMETRY_AUDIT_INGEST_URL
🔐 secretAGENTMETRY_API_KEYcan post to that orchestrator, and the events arrive stamped
configAGENTMETRY_URL
🔐 secretAGENTMETRY_AGT_HMAC_KEY
🔐 secretBLACKBOX_API_KEY
configAGENTMETRY_INSTALL_ROOT
configAGENTMETRY_INGEST_TIMEOUT
configAGENTMETRY_LOG_COMMANDS
configAGENTMETRY_LOG_FULL_ARGS
configAGENTMETRY_ADAPTER
configAGENTMETRY_ENFORCE
configAGENTMETRY_HOOK_DEBUG
configAGENTMETRY_HEARTBEAT_SECONDS
configQWEN_HOME
configKIMI_CODE_HOME
configAGENTMETRY_HOST
Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_AGENTMETRY_API_KEY
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_ORCHESTRATOR_URL
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_SAME_ORIGIN
deployNEXT_PUBLIC_WS_URL
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

3/3 tools missing one or more hints — read_note (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); read_jsonl_tail (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); list_notes (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint). OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Tool test coverage

1/3 tools referenced in tests (33%)

Write tests that reference each tool by name so every tool has at least one test.

Secrets not logged

2 secret values sent to print

Redact or omit secret values from log output.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/blitzcrieg1/agentmetry)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/blitzcrieg1/agentmetry)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 8d407c6c76ec4b6aae278b1d29ff7df2d201b9df
code hash: 48b878e0944d2398f98e5a660971f8325b4327d7da6eb4224cdc50e38b06cc07
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client