Codex Ask User (blhsing/codex-ask-user) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 2 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

C
Caution
74/100

Codex Ask User

Enables Codex to clarify requirements via native MCP elicitation controls, supporting single/multiple-choice and free-text questions with recommended answers and a discuss-first option.

Caution. Specific findings reduced this grade. They are listed on the page. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

blhsing

Source: Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

Install from

The grade above is for the source repository. Registries can serve a different version, so we mark the ones we were not able to read.

// key findings
⚠️
Tool annotations don’t match behaviour
1 read-only tool performs write/delete/exec — ask_user (line 311: /^choice_(\d+)$/.exec(value))
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations match behaviour

1 read-only tool performs write/delete/exec — ask_user (line 311: /^choice_(\d+)$/.exec(value))

Either remove the readOnlyHint:true annotation, or remove the write/delete call from the tool handler.

Tool handlers catch errors

Only 0/2 tool handlers wrap calls in try/catch (0%)

Wrap each tool handler body in try/catch and return a structured error response.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Shell command execution

1 child_process call — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 4 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Verified](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/blhsing/codex-ask-user?variant=verified)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/blhsing/codex-ask-user)
Shows verification status without the grade. Want the grade badge instead? Remove ?variant=verified from the URL.
commit: 544aee3f8544e9817d654ff0a80c48f173772a1a
code hash: 540dfb16a1776082ded8e2392593105ff776a314c1172c5715eaaae94e75cb72
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client