HealthClawGuardrails (aks129/HealthClawGuardrails) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. M8ven has not graded it: there is no public source to read and no endpoint we can reach, so there is nothing for us to inspect. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Emerging

74/100

19 days ago

HealthClawGuardrails

Item: HealthClawGuardrails
Rating: 74
Author: M8ven

Open-source guardrails between AI agents and FHIR clinical data — PHI redaction, immutable audit, step-up auth, tenant isolation. MCP server + OpenAI/Gemini adapters. A healthclaw.io project.

→ aks129/HealthClawGuardrails · listed on glama

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every push why connect →

Who stands behind it

aks129

Source: Glama · also listed on github_topic

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

Glama GitHub

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings

✅

No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation

Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.

🔐

You'll be asked for 2 credentials: INTERNAL_TOKEN_MINT_SECRET, MCP_AUTH_TOKEN

These are read from process.env at runtime. Make sure you trust where they’ll be sent.

// environment variables

To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.

configALLOWED_ORIGINS

configFHIR_BASE_URL

🔐 secretINTERNAL_TOKEN_MINT_SECRET

🔐 secretMCP_AUTH_TOKEN

configMCP_DEMO_TENANT

configMCP_PORT

configMCP_PUBLIC_DEMO

configRATE_LIMIT_MAX

configREAD_TOKEN_AUTOMINT

configSHL_SERVER_URL

configTENANT_ID

Deployment configuration, supplied by whoever hosts the server. Users are not asked for these.

deployPORT

// quality suggestions

All four hints declared on every tool

29/29 tools missing one or more hints — context_get (missing: idempotentHint); fhir_read (missing: idempotentHint); fhir_search (missing: idempotentHint), +26 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

README present

No README found

Add a README.md describing the server and its tools.

License file

No license file

Add a LICENSE file (MIT, Apache-2.0, etc.).

Shell command execution

5 child_process calls — runs shell commands

Prefer library functions over shell-outs. If you must shell out, ensure all inputs are properly escaped.

Secrets not logged

1 secret value sent to console.log

Redact or omit secret values from log output.

Dependency freshness

1/4 production deps stale: node-fetch@2023-11-30 (2.7y)

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail

The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.

// improvement guidance — verified publishers only

We have 5 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.

// embed badge in your README

[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/aks129-healthclawguardrails-di8pra)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/aks129-healthclawguardrails-di8pra)

Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.

commit: 318ac55f90e70d5e61eab11ba6befd8294591336

code hash: 75a040ef249a7f6e4b326c848bcffa0424453e4a3e06d1b77a559bd2b53f7adb

verified: 8/7/2026, 4:44:04 AM

view raw JSON →

Check MCPs from inside your assistant

Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check

check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern

How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client