BrowserControl (adityasasidhar/browsercontrol) is an MCP server listed on the M8ven Trust Index. It scores 74 out of 100, grade C. It declares 39 tools. No publisher has claimed this listing.

Back to MCP Trust IndexM8ven
C
Emerging
74/100
8 days ago

BrowserControl

Enables browser automation through visual interaction using numbered screenshots where interactive elements are marked for precise clicking, form filling, and web scraping with persistent sessions and debugging capabilities.

→ adityasasidhar/browsercontrol· pypi: browsercontrol· 1.7K installs· listed on pulsemcp

Emerging. No concerning findings. Grades remain capped until the project builds reputation through adoption. Grades reflect the full trust pyramid: code, verification depth, and reputation. New projects cap at C until adoption is earned.

How we verified

Code Verified⚡ Live Monitored: not connected

Verified is a snapshot. Live keeps it current, and builds your track record.

⚡ Connect GitHub → continuous verification on every pushwhy connect →

Who stands behind it

adityasasidhar

Source: PulseMCP · also listed on Glama

Is this your MCP?

Claim it to get a verified publisher badge, a free copy of our full audit findings, and direct contact for any high-priority issues we find. Or connect your repo for our deepest verification, Live Monitored: read-only, revoke anytime. What we access →

⚡ Connect GitHub for Live Monitored

Install from

PulseMCPGlama

M8ven verifies MCPs across every public registry — install directly from whichever one you prefer.

// key findings
✅
No credential exfiltration, no sensitive file access, no obfuscation
Static analysis found nothing flowing your secrets to unexpected places.
✅
Open source with a license and README
Anyone can audit the code, the license is declared, and the publisher documents what it does.
// environment variables
To run this server yourself, you supply these values. They go in your own MCP client configuration and stay on your machine. The secret label means the value is sensitive, not that the server mishandles it.
configBROWSER_HEADLESSfalse to watch the browser work
configBROWSER_VIEWPORT_WIDTH1280
configBROWSER_VIEWPORT_HEIGHT720
configBROWSER_TIMEOUTNavigation timeout, ms
configBROWSER_USER_DATA_DIRProfile directory
configBROWSER_EXTENSION_PATHUnpacked extension to load at launch
configBROWSER_EXECUTABLE_PATHChromium binary to drive, when Playwright ships no build for your platform
configBROWSER_RECORDINGS_DIRWhere traces are saved
configBROWSER_SNAPSHOTS_DIRWhere snapshots are saved
configLOG_LEVELINFO
// quality suggestions

Tool annotations

No tools have read-only/destructive annotations

Add readOnlyHint or destructiveHint annotations to every tool so hosts can warn users before invoking.

All four hints declared on every tool

39/39 tools missing one or more hints — get_page_content (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_text (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint); get_page_info (missing: readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint), +36 more. OpenAI's directory rejects tools where any of the four hints are missing or non-boolean.

For every tool, set all four hints (readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint) to explicit true/false values that match the handler’s actual behaviour.

Claim the listing to review these findings one by one and send us a correction where you disagree, straight to the team. Claiming also means we tell you when the grade moves, and reach you first if we find anything urgent.

// full audit trail
The findings above are the summary. The full trail, every check we ran, each deduction, the network hosts observed and the dependency advisories, goes to verified publishers, along with an alert whenever a new one lands. Verified publishers can also review each finding and dispute it in one click. Publisher corrections have sharpened several of our checks this month, because the maintainer knows the codebase better than any scanner.
// improvement guidance — verified publishers only
We have 2 concrete improvements we can share with the publisher of this MCP. Each comes with specific guidance to raise the trust score.
// embed badge in your README
[![M8ven Score](https://m8ven.ai/badge/mcp/adityasasidhar/browsercontrol)](https://m8ven.ai/mcp/adityasasidhar/browsercontrol)
Shows your grade and updates automatically. Prefer no grade? Append ?variant=verified to the badge URL.
commit: 95a4182e6df8931f63db8d21f19da68eb0745143
code hash: 9465ac421fda9a89b07d653e9da250d85dd6e06426d19903ed8decd98fd6bd93
verified: 9/2/2026, 8:01:52 PM
view raw JSON →
Check MCPs from inside your assistant
Tool Check · MCP

Vetting this one by hand? Tool Check is an MCP that scores other MCPs. Add it once and ask Claude, ChatGPT, or any MCP client to grade a server, surface CVEs, check the publisher, and suggest safer alternatives — before you install.

https://m8ven.ai/api/mcp/tool-check
check_toolsearch_toolscompare_toolsrecommend_alternativescheck_publisherreport_concern
How to add it →Free · no account needed · works in any MCP client